TenderCrest AI

SEE THE REAL PRODUCT

Evidence you can inspect.
Decisions you can review.

Explore real captures from the proposal workspace, then download an actual saved-revision package. No account is needed for this tour.

Fictional data, actual interface. These captures come from an isolated Fictional Acorn evaluation project. Every company capability and certification is synthetic. Screenshots are read-only; they make no AI requests and submit nothing. They show a later review-needed state; the downloadable package is an earlier reviewed revision.

A clearer response starts here

See the response
take shape.

A 30-second look at how requirements, company evidence and team review come together in TenderCrest AI.

  1. Evidence
  2. Draft
  3. Review
  4. Export
Then try the interactive demo →
30 seconds · silent, captioned overview. Fictional scenario with actual workspace captures.

Read the walkthrough transcript
  1. 00–06s · Start with the RFP. Bring requirements, company evidence, drafting and team sign-off into one workflow.
  2. 06–12s · Connect evidence. Inspect approved answers and source quotations, then record a human decision.
  3. 12–18s · Shape the draft. Edit sections, retain requirement links and review the saved revision.
  4. 18–24s · Review. Check gaps and approvals. The actual fictional capture shows unresolved checks; readiness is not an award guarantee.
  5. 24–30s · Export and explore. Inspect Word, PDF and matrix files from an earlier reviewed fictional package, then try the demo without an account or card.

Screen captures show a review-needed state. The downloadable package is an earlier reviewed revision. No customer data, certification or measured customer result is represented.

1. Trace a requirement to approved evidence

A requirement is linked to an approved answer and its source. Review the quotation, then record whether it supports the requirement and why. Similar wording alone is not a compliance decision.

Actual evidence review showing a 30-day access review requirement, synthetic source quotations, accepted and suggested evidence, and rationale fields.
The source identifies itself as synthetic. A reviewer still checks scope and validity; an approved answer does not verify a real certification. Open the image for full-size detail.

2. Edit the saved response

Proposal sections retain their requirement links and revisions. Authors edit the draft; reviewers approve the saved revision. A later change requires renewed review.

Actual proposal section editor with fictional response text, saved revision information, and a synthetic edit used to test stale approvals.
This capture shows a deliberate synthetic change used to confirm that older approvals cannot silently carry forward.

3. See what prevents final sign-off

The checklist makes unresolved review and pagination visible. Here the changed section needs approval, PDF pages need measuring, and the bid assessment is stale.

Actual submission checklist blocking sign-off because section approval, measured PDF pages and a current bid assessment are missing.
Readiness is a saved-revision check. It is not a guarantee of compliance, award or successful buyer submission. DOCX pagination is not measured.

4. Inspect an actual exported package

Download the earlier reviewed fictional revision: five-page PDF, editable DOCX, compliance CSV/XLSX, supporting attachment, source references and manifest. Compare the files to the manifest. The package is a demonstration, not customer proof.

Download fictional workspace package · ZIPCompare prepared examples

Evaluate it against your own workflow

Record your current preparation time, evidence gaps and reviewer corrections, then run the same authorized fictional or approved example through the workspace. Compare like-for-like work; include review time and unresolved requirements.

Open your proposal workspaceDownload evaluation scorecard · CSV

Workspace access requires sign-in and appropriate organization/project permissions. Read how access differs from paid emailed-draft allowances.